Ian Wilson
09-16-2004, 07:18 AM
Section 8770 of the PLS Act requires that the County Surveyor file Records of Survey and maintain an index of those maps as well as a “counter map” for public reference.
Section 8773.2 deals with Corner Records. It talks about indexing the filed Corner Records. It even talks about supplying the surveyor with “…date, book or volume, and the page at which the corner record is filed…” It never mentions referencing those corner records in any way.
If I’m reading this properly, what is to prevent the County Surveyor from just punching those corner records and sticking them in a binder without referencing them in anyway? With tight budgets and not enough money to go around, what’s to stop the County Surveyor from saving a few bucks by not bothering to note even the section, township and range in any form of index?
Is this something that should be addressed by a simple wording change in the legislation?
Before you tell me I’m tilting at windmills, let me tell you I have spoken with one County Official who brought this to my attention in a general discussion. I had to agree that I don’t see an indexing requirement as stringent as the RS requirement.
Comments, please?
Section 8773.2 deals with Corner Records. It talks about indexing the filed Corner Records. It even talks about supplying the surveyor with “…date, book or volume, and the page at which the corner record is filed…” It never mentions referencing those corner records in any way.
If I’m reading this properly, what is to prevent the County Surveyor from just punching those corner records and sticking them in a binder without referencing them in anyway? With tight budgets and not enough money to go around, what’s to stop the County Surveyor from saving a few bucks by not bothering to note even the section, township and range in any form of index?
Is this something that should be addressed by a simple wording change in the legislation?
Before you tell me I’m tilting at windmills, let me tell you I have spoken with one County Official who brought this to my attention in a general discussion. I had to agree that I don’t see an indexing requirement as stringent as the RS requirement.
Comments, please?